Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Living in a world of celebrity role models

Published: Monday, February 8, 2010

Updated: Monday, February 8, 2010 05:02

At the dawn of every New Year, the media likes to remind us of the most “memorable” moments of the year that has passed. In the world of Hollywood this usually means the most trivial nonsense. Who cares what happened with Taylor Swift? I mean, I am not vindicating Kanye West for his rude behavior toward her, but to make a martyr out of her and make a devil out of drunken celebrities is taking it too far. In writing this, I would like to mention that I am not a fan of either of them and that I did not even know who Taylor Swift was, I haven’t hear any of Kanye West’s songs.

Ranting aside, this country is obsessed with trifling celebrity news. We overplay and magnify celebrity drama to feed our emptiness and entertain ourselves with other peoples’ misery. We occupy ourselves with far too much reality TV, twitter news feeds and various other nonsense. Why do we live in a world where vain information takes precedence over real information? We have “artists,”such as Lady Gaga, who in the name of “art,” and say the most preposterous things. What’s worse is that we continue to fuel this rubbish by scourging real art and real singers. I know that art can be a very subjective topic and that some may find Picasso’s work strange while others may think he created masterpieces. However, the trend seems to be that vulgar behavior and continual “shocking” acts desensitize human emotion.

As of January 6, 2010, the United States Census Bureau estimated the world population to be 6.8 billion. This number is a whole lot bigger than Hollywood’s selected few, whom we keep obsessing over. Why don’t we, as a society give, other professions more importance and look to other professionals as role models? Instead, more and more people are in search of stardom, while qualified engineers and scientists are in the decline.

Jack Harris, a columnist for “Materials World,” stated that we are facing the prospect of a severe shortage of qualified scientists and engineers. This trend is also happening overseas. In his article, “The Wrecking of British Science,” Nobel Laureate Harry Kroto pointed out that during the past five years almost a third of UK university physics departments have either closed or merged. Furthermore, more young people are opting to study media studies rather than physics.

Why do we need to quench our vacant lives with celebrity gossip? The problem with celebrity gossip is that the celebrity life-style is usually projected as the ideal life style. The “glamorous life” becomes so tempting that the average person would think that it is what makes a person successful. This overplayed image of glamour does not necessarily make a person happy. Usually such a life would involve a lot of corruption, personal decay, drugs and excessive drinking. With these bad habits finding their way into music and movies, American youths have increased their consumption of liquor and drugs. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics the percent of students reporting street gang presence at school nearly doubled between 1989 and 1995, increasing from 15.3 percent to 28.4 percent (Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice). Another report stated that each year, students spend $5.5 billion on alcohol, more than they spend on soft drinks, tea, milk, juice, coffee or books combined. On a typical campus, per capita students spending on alcohol — $446 per student — far exceeds the per capita budget of the college library (Eigen, 1991 in the 1998 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse).

Imagine if such a cost was saved and spent on books. Or imagine if such a cost was spent to diminish poverty and help the less fortunate. I am not here to preach about vices, but the continual obsession with the typical “college life” has become horrifying. Even the term “college life” has changed for the worse over the years. Why do we brainwash ourselves with the idea that every person must go through this “experience” in order to fully mature? Why must “experience” come with a shot of tequila?

It seems that, in college movies, experiences have more to do with drinking and promiscuity than anything else. Some might argue that being promiscuous is not very dangerous now since youth have more knowledge of sexually transmitted disease than past generations, but the article “Perspective on Sexual and Reproductive Health” argues otherwise. According to this article, by T. Lane, adolescents lack specific knowledge of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) other than HIV, even if they have received relevant sexuality education. It was also reported that although the majority of respondents correctly identified HIV as a major STD (91 percent), just 2 percent could name all eight major STDs (most students left out HPV infections and Trichomonas).

So this reckless “glamorous life” comes with a heavy price. When such ideas of what makes youth cool are played over and over again, they become all that exists. The image presented to people becomes the self-image the audience adopts. Just like the many reality shows that have no meaning or goal, we are becoming what we see. Conversations have less meaning than they used to. I have noticed how nowadays many people would have to exaggerate their talk just to get the other party to believe them or pay attention. Media needs to hype up its news just to get reviews. This might not seem so serious when it is an issue on MTV, but on other channels such “hype” might mean war between countries.

— Carmen Awad is an IC Columnist and a sophomore majoring in business administration.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

4 comments

Carmen Awad
Sun Feb 21 2010 19:36
Thanks for the second comment. I like your comment and I agree with you but I just wanted to point out that the idea of "limiting our freedom" can make you seem like you're saying that having freedom is bad. I just think that freedom is not enough if it's going to be without responsibility and I agree with you a hundred percent when you said freedom differs from one person to another. Thanks again for your comment
Carmen Awad
Sun Feb 21 2010 19:30
Thanks to both of you that commented on my article. Relating to the first comment, the "freedom" you speak of is a subjective definition of freedom. I agree that one must have experience in order to mature, but what i am saying is that why do we have to go through this stereotypical "college" life in order to "mature"? Plus i never claimed to be more mature nor do I always sit at my dorms and watch documentaries. My articles are not written to "rail against people enjoying their freedom" it simply shows another opinion rather than this typical college life experience. Thank you for your comment anyway but don't make assumptions on my personality and what I do. and about the there are no children or mortgage part, there are student loans and some students are already either supporting their parents or supporting a family of their own.
Anonymous
Sun Feb 21 2010 16:25
in responding to the anonymous comment.....why is that some need to go through these mistakes in order to learn from them....we have brains nd we need to think before we act...we're not talkin about stupid small mistakes...we're talkin about huge mistakes that ruin poeple's lives.....and u're talkin about freedom but even freedom has limits...if we don't limit our freedom, then there is no point of thinkin of what's good or bad for us...coz most of the times we do want to do whatever we want even if it's bad for us but we do it because we like it and we're free to do it....but again the meaning of freedom differ from one person to another....and one more thing spending time reading nd watching historical documentaries and writing articles is better then spending our time obssesing over famous people nd "living the experience of so called college life".

i would like to thank the writer of this arcticle...

Anonymous
Tue Feb 16 2010 14:52
The key idea I think you are missing is that college is shown as a life with little responsibility - which it normally is. You do not have many bills. There are no children, mortgage or 401k to worry about. This freedom manifests itself in the rampant drinking and promiscuity.

And I don't think that has changed much with the times. High school and college movies have always portrayed young people with little responsibility living it up as much as possible. In order to be interesting, fictional characters must have more drama than we do, more sex than we do, and drink more than normal people.

And although you might deem yourself mature, other young adults need to suffer through the mistakes and extremes before they realize what their limits are and grow because of those discoveries. I personally do not agree with extreme drinking or promiscuity, but I do contend that one should enjoy the unparalleled freedom you find in
college life.

One should not spend all their time sitting in a dorm and watching historical documentaries and writing articles that rail against people enjoying their freedom. (Not saying you do... just seems like it.)







log out