Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

The Conspiracy of Trees

Published: Wednesday, September 15, 2010

Updated: Thursday, September 16, 2010 17:09


The interdisciplinary study of squirrels is growing by leaps and bounds, right here on the University of Toledo main campus. By observing animals close at hand, humankind can learn much about itself. Humans have become gradually alienated from nature since the onset of the Industrial Revolution. Adrift from nature, humanity quickly forgets how to survive.

Squirrel studies can open up profound areas of inquiry. For example, philosophers in Scott Hall gazing out the big window of their seminar room can observe and contemplate how squirrel essence informs the human condition, by reflecting on this koan:

Zen master Fa-ch'an was dying.

A squirrel screeched from the rooftop.

"It's just this" he said, "and nothing more."

Squirrel studies are happening all across campus this year as never before, and not only in philosophy. Students everywhere are bonding with each other and with their faculty mentors while gazing out of their classroom windows. "Eruditio ex squirrels" is the slogan of this intellectual enterprise. It is all about a newly-identified relevancy in our transforming university. If you are not learning about squirrels you had better see your advisor right away.

When curriculum begins to follow the money it can lead many academics in search of grants funding some exotic avenues of creative research. As the barista at our campus Starbucks put it to me yesterday, "Whodathunk ten years ago that I'd be studying for a career in solar and wind power? WhoooooWheeeee! I'm a windologist! My boyfriend gives me constant encouragement and says I'll go far! …"

Here is the latest scoop on the reasons for the rapid spread of scientific squirrel studies across campus at this time: The Pentagon apparently leaked to a few Wall Street firms some exploratory interest in squirrels as related to its well-funded global War Against Terrorism. Our new UT administration proactively pounced on the rumor and today squirrel power is already being discussed across campus as "the new solar!"

Just so, squirrel studies are considered an essential branch of STEMM research (Science, Technology, Engineering, Math and Medicine). Meanwhile the Arts and Science College deans and chairs have agreed unanimously that squirrel studies can provide insights into human food security issues locally and on a global scale. As I write, some social scientists on this campus are scrutinizing the squirrels as an "invasive species" (along with the zebra mussel and the "toe-sucking" monster carp) and as an example of "urban wildlife."

So what? Well, if the sound of money makes you stand erect and salute, thanks to the Pentagon leak there are all sorts of government agencies, the World Bank, NASA (flying squirrels) and even the United Nations quite happy to fund the scientific study of the squirrel.

Researchers in the USA have to do most of the heavy lifting on this front since there are as many squirrels as pigeons in our public places: brown squirrels, grey squirrels, red squirrels -- a rainbow of squirrels – all destined to be tranquilized, tagged and analyzed until external funding ceases.

What about the competition from India and China, you might ask? Don't fret. On a global scale, squirrel studies are a money game that the Chinese and the Indians cannot or will not play. This is because in China and Australia there is a dearth rather than a plethora of local squirrels to study.

Think about this: In the south of China around Old Canton where it was well-known that the locals "ate everything with legs but tables and chairs," you cannot today find a single squirrel burger. Meanwhile giant squirrels of India apparently never in their lifetimes touch the ground to bury nuts, and so are for classified reasons of no interest to the Pentagon and Wall Street at this time.

It is common knowledge that if you crave to eat squirrel morning, noon and night, you must go to Kentucky or Tennessee. The squirrel season officially opened this year in Tennessee on August 26th but it's never too late for the avid Appalachian sportsman to lock and load. Apparently anyone of any age or sex, when south of the Mason-Dixon Line, may choose their hunting weapons with abandon. Southern cougars and wild boar, for example, have been killed with frying pans, and on at least one occasion an adult black bear was killed with two banjos.

The all-time favorite rim-fire cartridge for squirrel hunting down south is the .22LR. Bigger bore rifles are occasionally used but condemned — by damn Yankees — as "overkill" and unsportsmanlike. An elephant gun is of course totally impracticable if you plan on making squirrel stews or pies out of your targets.

Bow-and-arrow enthusiasts also hunt the squirrel. According to one, who needs to take a WAC course at UT:

"Its fun and a lot more challenging. It's also good for the environment. Example a .22, you could just mop ‘em up; a bow, its harder and funner, and you could be hunting for a few hours and only have a few. So you're not just slaughtering squirrels. I like to shoot a few cottontails before a family BBQ. Great off-season sport and keeps you in shape for shooting!"

Remarkably, "down home" in Alabama some squirrel hunters choose to enter even the darkest woods bearing only slingshots. Many are grown men. Much of the chatter from up in the trees must be laughter -- "Watch out, Bucky! Man's got a slingshot! Har! Har!"

I am one of those who in mid-October join with the members of my class to gaze out of the high windows of University Hall facing Bancroft Street to contemplate the frenzied squirrels there hard at work. All is arboreal splendor rooted in green grass and a joy to behold. You can't duplicate this classroom learning experience on the Internet with distance learning. There is no substitute for the camaraderie of the classroom, which generates invariably a quality conversation like this:

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

27 comments

Anonymous
Fri Sep 17 2010 12:12
"They are in the process of searching and hiring three additional researchers."

It is my understanding that they have not been able to fill any of those positions or find a new Dean for that School. If you know different please inform us. Have any top researchers already assigned to the School left or announced they are leaving (and taking millions of their own research funding with them). As to a website does the new School even have one?? For a major academic unit and flagship unit on this campus you would think for promotion and recruitment they would have a very good one. Also the Wright center funding was for 3 Universities not just UT.

Again if anyone has answers to these questions please let us all know.

Anonymous
Fri Sep 17 2010 11:11
"Is he saying UT's solar research is as silly as research into squirrels would be?" No, Anonymous 16:20. He wrote of solar in this way only: "Today squirrel power is already being discussed across campus as 'the new solar!'" The implication is that the Jacobs Administration will perform handsprings while whistling in order to attract potential investors for any UT research endeavor. Remember His Excellency the sultan? The poor guy needed investment worse than we did! We gave him an honorary doctorate for just showing up! No one wants to see the University of Toledo laughed off the planet. Nemeth is most likely giving our Administration a wake-up call and a reminder to please try and restrain its ambitions while we still have some dignity left. "Top-tier" is nowhere on the horizon if Jacobs Inc. keeps up its inept antics. A&S College restructuring, for example, is an expensive Rube Goldberg invention this Administration needs not impose to on our students, their parents and the taxpayers at this time - if ever.
Anonymous
Fri Sep 17 2010 09:14
Agree the whole thing is sad. Though I also agree I'm confused by assertions that UT isn't good at solar.
Anonymous
Thu Sep 16 2010 21:03
A sad method that some people use to detract people from an actual conversation or argument because they can't contribute substantiated claims. Whoever is doing that must be afraid that people might have an actual debate on this subject, and that that debate or discussion might not be favorable to the university's restructuring plan. The commenter is in the same category as those Obama "birthers". Sooo, back to the actual discussion...
Anonymous
Thu Sep 16 2010 20:53
starting with the post at 19:24 and on the poster 'CAS Student' must be someone else (probably the same person who uses multiple aliases to comment in attempts to defame anyone who criticizes administration policies.)
Anonymous
Thu Sep 16 2010 20:50
nice job trying to defame the person who was posting as 'CAS Student' by spamming this column with completely immature comments. too bad you forgot to keep replacing 'anonymous' with 'CAS Student' after the first 3 spam posts so everyone can see that it was the same person spamming the entire time, and that it wasn't the original CAS Student who has been commenting.
Anonymous
Thu Sep 16 2010 19:43
Come on, there's gotta be more people like #6 out there. Give me a good one... Maybe the field house is a missile silo? Or UT beat Arizona? There's gotta be more "#6-type-Obama is a Kenyan Muslim-Marxist black helicopter conspiracy" views out there. If nothing else, you A & S people are nuts, so hit me with some more of that crazy!
Anonymous
Thu Sep 16 2010 19:36
Dr. Nemeth's metaphors are illuminating and profound.
Anonymous
Thu Sep 16 2010 19:35
The Arts & Sciences Blog and the Arts & Sciences Council are different.
Anonymous
Thu Sep 16 2010 19:35
Overall enrollment went down 9.5 percent this year
Anonymous
Thu Sep 16 2010 19:34
A & S humanities faculty do research.
Anonymous
Thu Sep 16 2010 19:33
Professors are smarter than their students and make more reasonable arguments.
Anonymous
Thu Sep 16 2010 19:32
Arts and Sciences faculty work hard.
Anonymous
Thu Sep 16 2010 19:32
UT's mascot is the penguin. (After #6 I assumed the goal was to say things that are demonstrably untrue)
Anonymous
Thu Sep 16 2010 19:31
UT has no College of Pharmacy. (This is fun.)
CAS Student
Thu Sep 16 2010 19:30
Sorry for the double post. I didn't think the first one went through.
CAS Student
Thu Sep 16 2010 19:29
Solar hasn't existed at UT since the early 1990s. Sounds like you're the idiots if you think UT is so good at something they don't even do anymore.
CAS Student
Thu Sep 16 2010 19:24
I don't see how you argue UT is good at solar when UT eliminated its solar programs in the 1990s. UT hasn't done solar research in decades and you claim solar is the thing UT is best at? I'd say you're the idiot.
Anonymous
Thu Sep 16 2010 19:23
We're not good at solar? The professors who came here from the National Renewable Energy Lab came here because we're not good at solar? Is this the new Arts and Sciences Council position? Just like how enrollment was down 9.5 percent? And you effing morons are allowed to teach students and give grades? No wonder the humanities at UT are failing. All the professors are idiots. Why does NSF keep giving UT money for solar if we're so bad at it?
Anonymous
Thu Sep 16 2010 19:19
I'm sorry, is your argument that solar experts aren't good because you don't like their administrative head and their Web site is poor? really? There's been more than $37 million in UT solar research funding in the last three years. The Ohio department of development invested more than 18 million alone for a Wright Center. They are in the process of searching and hiring three additional researchers. Are you saying that the administration controls usa today somehow? There denials simply because you personally dislike the administration are getting ridiculous. Just to prove how misinformed you are, the $10 million has been sit aside to help faculty and comercialize their research, it wasn't all donated to solar. I wonder if you faculty critics would still be so angry if even a fraction of your facts were correct. Facts, by the way, that are easily found reading the Blade. Why does the governor come to Toledo to name it a solar hub? Why do Obama and Biden mention Toledo as a solar hub? If you want to insist that black is white and wet is dry, I suppose you have that right, but your "arguments" are ridiculous. Wanna add that you think Obama is a Kenyan while you're at it?






log out