College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Student reflection: Obama

Students reflect on the Obama administration roughly one year after the historic election

By Hasan Dudar

Print this article

Published: Thursday, November 5, 2009

Updated: Thursday, November 5, 2009

Yesterday marked the one-year anniversary of the 2008 presidential election in which President Barack Obama defeated Republican Senator John McCain to become president-elect Obama, through a campaign promising change to Americans.

Campus Progress, an organization dedicated to helping the youth get their voices heard, hosted a conference call Tuesday with leaders from several student and youth organizations around the country to weigh in on the progress Obama and Congress have made in the past 10 months.

The participants ranged from members of economic-focused groups, such as 80 Million Strong for Young American Jobs, to more social issue-based groups, such as the National Youth Advocacy Coalition, which supports social justice for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth.

As Erica Williams from Campus Progress explained, the motivation behind the conference call was to get young people to “talk about how the president and congress have delivered on the change that young Americans voted for and continue to demand.”

Williams noted that over 22 million 18-29 year olds voted for Obama in 2008, and those voters are now eager to see change on a range of issues from health care to LGBT rights.

Assessing the progress of health care reform in the U.S., Ari Matusiak from the Y.I. Want Change Coalition stated, “Well, it’s one year later and we still have a ways more to go, so I guess the grade is not yet submitted.”

Matusiak expressed how “[health care] is our crisis — our generations crisis — and what is good for young Americans on health care will be good for all Americans.”

However, not all young Americans are as enthusiastic as Matusiak when it comes to Obama’s public option plan for health care reform. Krystal Weaver, a senior majoring in pharmacy at UT, said, “I don’t think that Obama’s plan for a public option is the best solution — government getting involved [in health care] is not the right solution. You don’t want a politician or bureaucrat making medical decisions for you; you want your physician making that decision.”

Brad Davy, a senior majoring in political science, voiced support for Obama’s health care ambitions; however, he expressed some disappointment in the progress of the reform.

“I think the president could’ve acted much more aggressively when it comes to health care,” Davy said.

Obama and Congress’ progress on environmental issues was also a topic of concern during the conference call.

“We have been thrilled to see that the president has acted on energy efficiency standards, fuel efficiency standards, passed a stimulus packed full of money and resources for the green economy,” said Jesse Tolkien, speaking on behalf of the Energy Action Coalition.

Davy also said he believes Obama and Congress are taking the right measures when it comes to the environment.

“It’s the safest time to re-tool how we approach climate change,” he said.

But not all young people are buying into the environmental movement. Victoria Jarufe, a freshman majoring in political science, opposes government action on environmental issues. “I think the problem with the environment is that politicians are going off on their own agendas with unsubstantiated data, in order to shift policy in a way that can have devastating affects on the quality of life and the economy,” Jarufe said.

The federal government’s progress on issues of social justice, such as the status of the LGBT community, arose during the conference call as well. Jed Barnum from NYAC, feels that there have been many strides made for the LGBT community in the past year.

“This is really the most supportive Congress and president our movement has ever had,” Barnum said.

Barnum was satisfied with the recent passing of the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Act, which includes crimes against an individual from the LBGT community under U.S. federal hate-crime laws. However, Barnum said “there are a lot of open promises from the president and from Congress that remain unfulfilled,” such as promised action on the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy in the U.S. armed forces.

Weaver said that the passing of the Shepard Act was a good measure to protect the LGBT community.

“I think people who — either physically or emotionally — hurt others based on how they express themselves should be punished … I think our rights end where others’ begin,” Weaver said.

Charles Calire, a junior majoring in paralegal studies, was not satisfied with the passing of the Shepard Bill.

“I have a problem protecting people because of their sexual orientation, because it’s a choice they make … the language of the bill is a concern,” Calire said. “If I come out and express my Christian beliefs that homosexuality is wrong, could that be a hate crime?”

Davy said the signing of the Shepard Act into legislation will make “huge strides” for the LGBT community, which he feels has been ignored at every level of government up until now.

“If this is the start of [Obama’s] journey, I think he’s headed in the right direction,” Davy said.

Jarufe said she does not believe in making special qualifications for people based solely on sexual preference or gender.

“Above all, gays and lesbians are human beings and should be given basic rights and proper treatment as human beings,” she said.

Speaking as one of the youth in opposition to Obama, Jarufe said “the day President Obama was inaugurated, we [America] stopped walking tall and carrying a big stick.”

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

3 comments

GayMan and PanWoman
Thu Nov 12 2009 11:32
Charles Calire, a junior majoring in paralegal studies, was not satisfied with the passing of the Shepard Bill.

“I have a problem protecting people because of their sexual orientation, because it’s a choice they make … the language of the bill is a concern,” Calire said. “If I come out and express my Christian beliefs that homosexuality is wrong, could that be a hate crime?”

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Your religion is a choice, but sexuality is never a choice. We only choose to lie about it when we want to stay in the closet. We tolerate religious extremists every day, but hate crimes happen to LGBT people all over the nation. These were not covered by the legal definition of hate crimes until now.

If this hate crime law protects your religious choice, shouldn't it protect those who have no choice?

b4b
Thu Nov 5 2009 17:54
the problem is the government....its not the answer.
we dont need more big government meddling in the market.

watch this video and you may begin to understand
vvvvw.youtube.com/watch?v=asY1Dup1wQY
^replaces v's with w's^

Nick
Thu Nov 5 2009 12:48
"Krystal Weaver, a senior majoring in pharmacy at UT, said, “I don’t think that Obama’s plan for a public option is the best solution — government getting involved [in health care] is not the right solution. You don’t want a politician or bureaucrat making medical decisions for you; you want your physician making that decision.”"

I don't understand this rationale. Government health-care is not about deciding medical procedures; it's about being able to pay for them. As it stands now, you have for-profit anonymous claims adjusters whose job it is to find ways to deny claims making your health care decisions for you. In every other civilized, modern society on the planet, government pays for health care, and doctors perform it -- that's what we need. This sort of ignorance, Ms. Weaver, is precisely why 45,000 American citizens (that's one every 12 minutes) die every year due to lack of health insurance. It's also why 1.5 -million- Americans lose their homes due to health care related bankruptcies.

The lack of empathy for our fellow human beings is astounding. We can fund two senseless wars, but we can't provide medical care to American citizens? Unbelievable.







log out