Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Students protest layoffs

Published: Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Updated: Tuesday, July 7, 2009 01:07

Over 100 students protested the layoffs of several employees from the Division of Student Affairs on

Tim Kershner / IC

Over 100 students protested the layoffs of several employees from the Division of Student Affairs on Wednesday by sitting in a silent protest outside President Lloyd Jacobs office on the third floor of University Hall.

Over 100 students protested the layoffs of several employees from the Division of Student Affairs on

Tim Kershner / IC

Director of Student Involvement Lori Edgeworth sits in the Divison of Student Affairs staff meeting

Tim Kershner / IC

Director of Student Involvement Lori Edgeworth sits in the Divison of Student Affairs staff meeting yesterday surrounded by students protesting her termination as an employee.


A meeting between Vice President of Student Affairs Kaye Patten Wallace and staffs from the Division of Student Affairs was interrupted as more than 100 students piled into the Student Union Building room 2592 yesterday at about 9 a.m.

Heads turned as students wearing their organizations' T-shirts, holding up signs such as "Retain this," "I would have transferred," "Have you ever been to our meetings? Lori has," and "Would you help us plan Songfest?" walked silently into the room, filling up every corner.

Laid off

UT President Lloyd Jacobs announced on late Sunday that 100 people will be laid off. On Tuesday, six individuals out of about 100 staff from the Division of Student Affairs were told they were among those who will lose their jobs in 90 days.

They are Director of Student Involvement Lori Edgeworth, Assistant Director of Student Activities and Leadership Jacquelyn Jones, Director of Multicultural Student Services Nina Grant, Assistant Director of Student Judicial Affairs Terry Teagarden, Assistant Director of Student Activities and Leadership Development Ricardo Reddick and Executive Assistant to the Vice President Chris Giordano.

Teagarden has served UT for the last 21 years and said he was never under the impression that any specific department would be spared from the layoffs.

"I never felt invulnerable, because I believe every position is expendable," he said.

Students' testimonials

David Gulley, a senior majoring in individualized studies, said his involvement in Student Judicial Affairs, Alpha Phi Alpha and the Office of Student Involvement had led to positive experiences with those individuals affected by the layoff.

"Lori Edgeworth, Jackie Jones, Terry Teagarden and Nina Grant, who anytime you walk into their office, needed anything, they broke their necks, stayed here after 5 o'clock to make sure the job got done - whether it's for Dance Marathon, Songfest, Homecoming - They work tireless hours," Gulley said.

Emily Duerringer, a senior majoring in psychology who is involved in Blue Key, Mortar Board, Dance Marathon, the Delta Delta Delta Sorority and UT Ambassadors, had worked closely with those individuals as well.

"They have 100 percent been student-centered; they have 100 percent been advocates for the students, and when you take away these four people, you take away the student's voice as far as our organizations go," she said. "We're pissed, we're mad, we're upset; this is absolutely outrageous."

Teagarden, however, saw the situation in a more positive way.

"I've had a great ride and look forward to my next adventure," he said.

The process of budget cuts

Patten Wallace explained that each vice president was asked to come up with budget scenarios representing 7 percent and 15 percent cuts in their areas. The senior staffs of each division, consisting of Patten Wallace, Interim Dean of Students Michele Martinez, Director of Residence Life Jo Campbell and Senior Business Manager Marcia Culling, looked at every position, responsibilities, the remaining staff and made sure they had staff on board to continue to carry out those responsibilities.

"We want them to know that they are very valuable, but this is totally a business-driven decision, and what we have to focus on now is restructuring in a manner so we can live up to the commitment we're making to students - that is to have an effective, efficient and productive services to them that will be nothing less than what they're used to," Patten Wallace said.

Patten Wallace said she assured students none of the student services and programs will be cut.

The Division of Student Affairs had about $1 million in cuts, which constitutes about 5 percent of their budget.

Students joined forces

A student leader sent out a mass e-mail on Tuesday at 7:45 p.m. regarding the layoffs. After about an hour, over 200 student leaders showed up in the Student Union Building Auditorium to discuss the termination of Edgeworth, to encourage student leaders to submit letters to support a reconsideration of the layoffs and to create plans to attend the Student Affairs staff meeting on Wednesday.

Student leaders emphasized the importance of approaching this issue as professionally as possible and stressed that students should drop the mentality that their actions will not make a difference.

"We're going to be there; we're not going to be crazy, rioting, but simply saying that we care, this does affect us," said Breanne Democko, a senior majoring political science and public administration, who was a former SG vice president and is involved in multiple student organizations.

"The students have a tremendous impact on decisions around the university, and I'm sure their voice will be heard and whatever effect it may have, who knows," said Teagarden, who also said he did not witness the protest, but had heard about it.

President of UT's Communication Workers of America Chapter Robert Hull said he spotted the group of students in the middle of the Centennial Mall early Wednesday.

"These are the clients; the students are the reasons the administrators have a job, so it should be effective," he said. "If they pay no attention to this, it's time to remove the administration because these students are the reason why the administration is here."

He added the CWA has lost 22 employees from the layoff this week.

"This is an extremely difficult time at the university, and it's extremely difficult for us to have to make these decisions," Patten Wallace said. "It's really hard to say goodbye to people who we have worked with for years and people who have been valuable contributors to the university ... I think it's important to allow the staffs and the students to go through that grieving process," she said.

Students organized protest

After witnessing the students' presence, listening to Jones and Reddick speak and listening to current SG President Kyrstal Weaver's speech at the end of the Division of Student Affairs staff meeting, the staff left the room teary-eyed and gave hugs to each other.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

21 comments

Blizzle
Thu May 14 2009 22:31
Kaye Patten Wallace is only interested in helping BSU avoid campus sanctions after BSU riots in the Student Union during the fashion show.

KPW has consistently allowed dorm residents guilty of drug and weapons violations back into the dorms almost immediately after they were caught.

KPW did nothing to protect student employees from harassment and threats of physical harm coming from the many felons living on-campus.

KPW allowed a male RA who was using desk keys to go into girls rooms to continue working for the dorms.

KPW has only 1 mission...forward her personal, social agenda at UT. Her employment history is littered with instances of "restructuring" and other mis-management catchphrases.

KPW says she, "Manages by walking around", but she only walks around her office.

This is the type of leadership that is willing to hang students and loyal employees out to dry as long as it doesn't affect her comfy, little world. A very close-minded and bigoted world indeed!

Blizzle
Thu May 14 2009 22:29
Kaye Patten Wallace is only interested in helping BSU avoid campus sanctions after BSU riots in the Student Union during the fashion show.

KPW has consistently allowed dorm residents guilty of drug and weapons violations back into the dorms almost immediately after they were caught.

KPW did nothing to protect student employees from harassment and threats of physical harm coming from the many felons living on-campus.

KPW allowed a male RA who was using desk keys to go into girls rooms to continue working for the dorms.

KPW has only 1 mission...forward her personal, social agenda at UT. Her employment history is littered with instances of "restructuring" and other mis-management catchphrases.

KPW says she, "Manages by walking around", but she only walks around her office.

This is the type of leadership that is willing to hang students and loyal employees out to dry as long as it doesn't affect her comfy, little world. A very close-minded and bigoted world indeed!

Your name
Fri May 1 2009 21:57
Jan, perhaps if our politicians made more, we'd get better politicians. As of now, since the money is relatively low compared to other high-level executive jobs, the only people with a desire to run for office are those hungry for power. I'd rather have people competing for jobs because of the benefits than have people run for office purely because they want power over other people's lives.
LUT4 Facilitator
Fri May 1 2009 10:47
Has anyone heard the fate of Leadership UT? This is a fantastic program and I would hate to see it fall apart. It will be difficult to continue as both of our coordinators/advisors/teachers were laid off. Was LUT a budget cut too?
Jan
Fri May 1 2009 09:57
It is apparent that KPW is an ineffective administrator. How many times has Student Affairs been "restructured " since her arrival on campus? The administrators let go or forced out are the experienced (know more than she does about student affairs) staff. Those remaining won't question her because their knowledge and experience are even less than hers.

Also UT is top heavy. Rather than building his empire, LJ should look at makiing his area more efficient. Oh, but if he did that he couldn't justify his outrageous salary and bonuses. It's ridiculous that a state University president makes more than the governor. The old boy network is thriving at UT and in the process quality is suffering.

Good Luck UT
Thu Apr 30 2009 23:04
The decisions may have not been personal, but they are definitely political. How many executive and director staff members remain from what was The University of Toledo?...Very few. They either left voluntarily or were laid-off. Ever since the MUO acquisition of UT there has been a significant loss of talented and dedicated staff members. Good luck to those departing and those that remain. Best wishes for the students and faculty.
Long timer
Thu Apr 30 2009 21:29
I have worked at UT for nearly 30 years and have seen this scenario consistently repeated each time UT faced budget problems: long-standing employees, professionals completely dedicated to the institution and it's students and praised publicly by the institution for that dedication, possessed of the knowledge and savvy required to navigate UT's systems and bureaucracy and get results (and with the decency to step out from behind their desks, voice mail, and email and talk one-on-one), are simply cut loose. It matters not who populates UT's management at the time, the song remain the same. "This is totally a business-driven decision" sounds a lot like "Nothing personal, it's just business".
ashley brown
Thu Apr 30 2009 21:18
what makes you think we dont care about the police siutation? i dont think its very fair to assume we dont care, when we are going through a very hard time here and you're changing the subject by saying we don't care that the police are getting laid off.

to remove an organization that brings students together and has helped many of us grow over the past many years is heartbreaking and just really goes to show how student centered UT is not. they might think they are doing this for our own good, but damn, it doesn't seem like too many people are happy about it.

Krystal Weaver - Student Body President
Thu Apr 30 2009 19:52
Thats a great idea Tina. We need to be a part of the solution going forward. Talk to me soon. If you want to take the lead I will support you in anyway that I can.
Tina Wagner
Thu Apr 30 2009 18:29
I find it intersting that those of you who are saying "business is business" are not sharing your names. So, I wonder if those layoffs affect you as a student or you as a faculty member? Maybe you are a person who is not involved in campus organizations. If that is the case, how would you know what it is like to run an organization? How would you know the types of things that these people have helped us with? There are many times that I have called on Nina grant and Ricardo Reddick to help me with something. As I said, they have never failed me or my organization.

I'd like to get a group of student leaders together to propose a plan to save UT money, and earn our staff back.

Your name
Thu Apr 30 2009 18:04
People really need to realize that business is business. Who honestly thinks that President Jacobs and the others making these budget cuts were going "Oh, I would really like to fire this person and screw over their life!"? It's never an easy thing to do and honestly, it is not just the University that is doing this sort of thing. This is happening all over the country. UT is honestly taking steps to streamline their business and save money while the economy is in the shape that it is in.

Hell, one thing I dont hear people complaining about is the city laying off 150 police officers this week. We can honestly be self sufficient and deal with the consequences and adjust to the changes that UT is making with no real threat to safety. On the other hand, the city is laying off police that are there to protect our safety (and 150 police is pretty significant....I believe it takes the city down to like 800 police as opposed to 950+). Why arent the students protesting this when this honestly has a more profound impact on many people attending the University since many students are commuters or live in areas protected by the police?

Student leaders need to learn to be self sufficient for a while and run organizations without this extra help. In all honesty, it will promote true leadership and growth when people are forced to handle situations and issues themselves. That is one of the positives that is coming out of the very unfortunate layoffs.

I do commend students for taking their time to protest though...people just need to see that business is business.

adam
Thu Apr 30 2009 17:36
All the Greek houses are getting a 12% cost reduction in housing this next year. I think that adds up to over $3000 per resident a year. Instead of passing that petition around to get ANOTHER person fired, how about we take the hit and waive the discount via petitioning?
Tina Wagner
Thu Apr 30 2009 17:28
I don't feel that we should blame the VP or Michele Martinez. They had to do what they were asked to do. Imagine they were not doing their jobs, they would be at risk of losing theirs. With that said, I could not imagine UT without Nina Grant. She has done so much to help Spectrum. She has come to many of our events where other faculty has not. She is a smiling face that has never ailed to help me out.

Instead of complaining why don't all of us student leaders get together and see what we can come up with for a plan to save money? We could give up some of our priviledges. We could close the Student Union earlier. Lets have a meeting brain storm and see where we can cut to help pay for our staff? If we can earn the money that it costs to pay the staff, we should get them back with no arguement.

Tina Wagner
Spectrum President

A&S Faculty Member
Thu Apr 30 2009 13:32
The students being offered the free tuition statistically speaking live in areas where they are likely to get very sizable Pell Grants from the Federal Government. The vast majority of this program is paid for by federal and state student aid, not from the University budget. This has been explained pretty well, in my opinion, in faculty senate meetings and other locations. I sympathize greatly with all students grieving right now, but I do think this program is very important and a wise use of UT money. There's plenty of waste around, but I would really encourage you to focus on that. I think UT Guarantee is precisely the kind of program for students we need to see more of and focus our energies on administrative waste.
Your name
Thu Apr 30 2009 13:15
Pretty amazing that UT can eliminate a student activities/judicial position, but not consider other "fluff" areas in student affairs whose programs/services are duplicated within colleges (career!) This seems very typical of UT - it's ALL about politics and not about quality.
Your name
Thu Apr 30 2009 12:18
If UT is in such a budget crunch why are they offering free tuition to any inner city student in the state of Ohio? The only requirements are a 3.0 GPA and the elegibility of a grant. How are we supposed to retain these high-risk students? I believe that accountability in Enrollment Services under Larry Burns needs to be examined.
Sam Adams
Thu Apr 30 2009 11:57
I agree with Dan! KPW has NOT considered what she has done to this Department. You want to make up for a shortfall? Then why are you taking actions that will DECREASE student retention, satisfaction, and overall education? They have put themselves first. The politics at play are no hidden story and everytime Kaye is asked, "How did you make these decisions," she gives some broken record excuse that runs around the question. Not to mention Scott Scarborough tagging along behind her on every occassion. He's a talker. He doesn't have the answers himself because there ARE NONE! They wiped out this effieciency of this Office entirely, left ineffective leadership behind, and put student life at risk. WE NEED TO STAND UP AND CONTINUE TO PUSH FOR OUR RIGHTS! If we aren't heard now, then the Administration forfeits its legitimacy. it forfeits its right to speak anything on student centeredness, stewardship, care, and "improving the human condition." And correct me if I misinterpret this quote, but when Michele Martinez says there will be new faces.... so we fired people so we could hire someone else with no clue on the history and traditions of this University?

And Aye aye! to the comment about Lori and Terry working on towards retirement. What a great way for UT to dodge a bullet. Let go the people who have been the hardest working, most dedicated, and sincere so we don't have to take care of them in the future. They have given too much to this University, Dr. Jacobs, for you to turn your back on them now. I understand this is a financially difficult time, but allowing KPW to do this is shooting the students, the university, and the community overall in the foot. School ends in a week, but the fight doesn't. Many of us will still be here and you better believe we won't quit. WE WON'T QUIT! You have to hear us out. We produce 200 of the top leaders on campus in 2 hours. There are 20, 30, 40, 50, or more students behind each of them. We ARE the voice of the students. Please, don't turn your back on us.

I love this University with all my heart. I've worked extremely hard with this office over the past four years to put on events for all of the students. It has made me a better person, a better leader, and a better representation of what this University CLAIMS to be about. I refuse to sit by idlely and watch KPW eliminate the people that made that possible.

In tower shadows,

Sam Adams
4th year Honors Biology Major (Pre-med, UTCOM in the Fall) Chemistry Minor
Blue Key Class of 2008-2009
Mortar Board Class 2008-2009
Student Activities Committee Co-Chair
Student General Fee Committee Spring '09
President of Resident Student Association 2006-2007
It goes on... don't take this away from our future Rockets.

Your name
Thu Apr 30 2009 11:48
In my previous posting, I listed an incorrect name. It is Betty Stanford, not Standifer. Sorry Betty.
Your name
Thu Apr 30 2009 11:43
All of these individuals will be missed not just by students but by their colleagues from across the campus. I have worked with Terry and Lori and Betty Standifer (Scholarship Office) and know the commitment they have to serve students and to assist other staff. Upper-level administrators are often here for the short term adding to their own personal career development, touting their achievements to new employers, and then moving on. Staff such as the individuals being let go are the ones who stay for the love of the students and the love of the institution (they all have been here over 20 years!). The institutional history we lose when long-term employees are let go can never be recovered. While there is always room for improving the way we do our jobs, sometimes "reorganizing" and/or "reassigning" duties does not mean improvement. It may look good on paper but the reality of the loss of the institutional history, as well as the loss of the wealth of knowledge these individuals possess about their own jobs as well as functions in other offices, has serious negative impacts. This is happening all over campus, especially in student services offices. I am seeing colleagues working 12-14 hour days, 6-7 days a week to pick-up the slack. They do this because they know that if the work doesn't get done, students are the ones to suffer. New people can be "trained" to perform tasks but without a good understanding behind the job and the history of the process, something is lost in translation. To do my job, I have depended on these people to assist me, to answer my questions, to understand the history/background of those questions and the processes. Individuals new to their duties do not have that understanding which in turn affects all of us-students and staff alike.

I recognize the difficulty in these decisions and don't completely understand the process division heads go through to make budget decisions like these especially when one hears of expenditures that don't seem to make sense. Does it make sense to send a student to Africa for a photo opportunity for Marketing? Does it make sense to pay for travel to China or Kazakhstan or other places for multiple executives? Does it make sense to have two Provosts? Yes, there are 2+ campuses and programs ranging from undergraduate to graduate/professional to oversee, but couldn't their duties be "reassigned" to 1 provost with the assistance of a couple of lower compensated administrators? These are the questions I ask myself in these tight budget times.

Dan
Thu Apr 30 2009 11:07
I will throw out my $0.02 worth, since I have some "inside information" on the subject, and know most of the affected staff personally.

Let's see ... most of the Student Affairs leadership staff was eliminated. Terry Teagarden had 21 loyal years at UT, Lori Edgeworth had 26 years (only 4 from retirement!!!) at UT. The university is not only losing competent, student-centric employees, but they are losing valuable experience in those key positions as well. Does anyone really believe that the quality and range of services will not be severely affected by these losses?!

Additonally, and contrary to popular belief and reports in the Blade, these laid-off staff members were not able to buy time nor get any supplemental credit towards their state retirement funds. They were not offered any buyout packages by the University as was reported by Dr. Jacobs. Imagine - dedicating 26 years to your job (needing 30 to retire), and then you are cut free with no benefits. (All benefits, including tuition benefits for enrolled family members, were terminated with their employment.) It's really a raw deal being given to them by the University.

On another note, why isn't anyone questioning the absurd turnover ratio in the Student Affairs department since Kaye Patten Wallace took over a few years ago?! This information, coupled with the quote by Kaye Patten Wallace "... that (when) the positions are eliminated, they will be restructuring within the division to compensate the loss." makes it sound like some serious interoffice politics at play to me. Out with the "old guard", and in with the new. Using a department restructuring excuse to get rid of any barriers to her full control of the department. Of course, Dr. Jacobs essentially did the same thing with the MUO merger (most of the senior staff retained was from MUO, not UT!) when he took over. Do we really expect him to criticize or prevent Kaye Patten Wallace for making the same kind of move? I personally will be curious to see who fills the missing roles in the Department, and what their official titles and responsibiliies will be.

I feel terrible for the staff, for the shoddy manner in which their loyalty has been rewarded by the school. I feel terrible for the students, who now have to deal with the results of the decisions of an insulated and isolated VP who is probably more concerned with playing her own power games. I feel bad for the community who is now being serviced by an institution that is making less than optimal decisions in a time of crisis.

Good luck to Lori, Terry, and the rest of the now unemployed Student Affairs staff. My heart goes out to you.

And shame on you, Kaye Patten Wallace!







log out