Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

University of Toledo Student Government rejects endorsing concealed carry on college campuses

Staff Reporter and Assistant News Editor

Published: Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Updated: Wednesday, February 6, 2013 04:02


Bob Taylor / IC

Ken Harbin and Patrick Richardson, members of the UT College Republicans, listen as the vote on proposed concealed carry legislation is struck down.


 After weeks of campus-wide deliberation and a heated debate, Student Government voted down a resolution that endorsed changing state law to allow concealed carry on college campuses.

After senators tallied the votes cast by secret ballot, the final count was 9-18 with a majority opposing the resolution.

Senator Clayton Notestine, the legislation’s sponsor, said he wanted to give students the opportunity to voice their opinions. Despite that, he said SG should be focusing on other issues.

“I think Student Government could better use its time helping the student body doing non-partisan things,” Notestine said. “I feel as though national politics should take a backseat to . . . campus politics.”

At the meeting, Justice Eman Al-Hassan spoke on behalf of SG’s Student Judicial Council, advising Senate to vote against the resolution because it was “unconstitutional.” 

Patrick Richardson, a member of UT’s College Republicans, asked Al-Hassan to point out what section of SG’s constitution the resolution would violate. Al-Hassan said SJC decided ahead of time not to debate their reasoning in the meeting, but they would address inquiries from individuals. 

Tate Stricklin, chief justice of Student Judicial Council, was unable to attend the meeting because of work, but was available to speak over the phone after. He did not disclose the section of the constitution in question, and said SJC had only planned on discussing their findings if the resolution passed. 

“The reason we will not discuss that is because the vote had not taken place, and had the vote taken place and had it passed, whatever we would have disclosed with our findings, provided that it was unconstitutional, would have very clearly been the basis of a case that would be presented by any senator who would have contacted us regarding the constitutionality of it,” Stricklin said.   

Stricklin said he thought the resolution impacted “a pretty small portion of the student body.”

“Do I think it’s a good idea to arm students, especially around the age where they are legally allowed to consume alcohol? I think it’s not a good idea.” 

After the meeting, College Republican President Scott Mazzola said he thinks SJC was “trying to scare people away from the resolution.”

A survey was available to students last week through their MyUT portal, and drew just over 5,100 opinions. Of the students that voted, about 49 percent supported the resolution, about 45 percent opposed and about 6 percent were neutral. 

A large number of people, including two faculty members, spoke at the meeting.  

Paul Brandt, a junior majoring in construction engineering technology, said SG should focus on issues that are more relevant to UT students.

“It’s a state issue; we’re a state university. You can’t change it, period,” he said. “You’re wasting your time here at the university with students who have more important things to do.”

SG President Paulette Bongratz said she supported the resolution and felt the vote was important.  

“I don’t think it was a waste of time at all,” Bongratz said. “Five thousand students did answer the poll, which is a sign that this is something on the mind of students, at least a quarter of the students at the University of Toledo. That’s more than how many came out to the polls for Student Government elections.”

Mazzola said regardless of the resolution’s outcome, College Republicans will use the survey results to advance the issue to the state level.   

“The survey compared to the senate vote, there’s a discrepancy,” Mazzola said. “We’re not stopping; this won’t be the last you hear from us.”

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

4 comments Log in to Comment

Tue Feb 12 2013 23:21
Look where all the shootings occur, GUN FREE ZONES. Try living in reality.
Wed Feb 6 2013 22:00
To the "sitting ducks" commenter; even if this passes, a very narrow minority of students would carry guns. If someone has the desire to kill people (and ultimately themselves) having maybe 500, possibly 1000 students on campus with guns will not discourage them. What's more is even those people with guns are not guaranteed to know how to use them, especially in a situation where their lives are at stake and they need to kill another human being in an intense setting. All that would mean is we've got a bunch of "shooting ducks" and two shooters. There's no conclusive evidence that guns discourage school shootings.
Wed Feb 6 2013 14:40
I believe everyone here is missing the point of the entire topic. If a criminal decides to take a gun on campus, he takes a gun on campus. If someone who is a law abiding citizen wants to take a gun on campus, they do not. If this fact, the criminal clearly knows that other students do not have guns, which means the criminal will not be stopped until the police are called after events are already unfolding.

Denying students the option to protect themselves on campus, legally, from people who already do not follow the "no guns on campus" law sure does create safety for our students. I believe the term is "sitting ducks".

Wed Feb 6 2013 11:40
Excellent! For all the crowing about "human rights" and "free speech" we've heard over the past week, allowing angry white conservatives (and you know they're the ones who want this) to tote guns on campus would lead to a major public safety disaster very quickly. I'm glad this got shut down without an endorsement even from an organization as powerless as Student Government.

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In